b5media.com

Advertise with us

Enjoying this blog? Check out the rest of the Health & Wellness Channel Subscribe to this Feed

Autism Vox

Autism Victims—Not

by Kristina Chew, PhD on June 19th, 2007

“Autism victims.” “Adult victims of autisms.”

To me, this is puzzling wording; the phrases come from an article published in our local paper, the Star Ledger, over the weekend.

Both phrases are used in the context of a public hearing about the New Jersey state budget; a father of 9-year-old autistic twins is mentioned as speaking on behalf of a “$350,000 appropriation to fund programs for adult victims of autism.”

Victims—not. My son Charlie is an autistic person, boy, student, child. I am glad that my state is concerned about the needs of autistic adults but calling them “victims” suggests a deep misunderstanding about what autism is—another autism stereotype (like this one); enough already.

POSTED IN: Legislation, New Jersey, Stereotypes

3 opinions for Autism Victims—Not

  • qchan63
    Jun 20, 2007 at 2:29 am

    Yeesh … that’s disappointing, especially for a big newspaper whose (presumably) more experienced reporters ought to know better. Did you happen to email the writer? I think any good journalist would appreciate a gentle heads-up.

  • Jennifer
    Jun 20, 2007 at 3:24 am

    I think it’s part and parcel of America’s still-unprogressive view of disabilities in general.

    You still, for instance, hear “confined to a wheelchair” or “wheelchair bound” on the news, despite the freedom, mobility, and independence the use of a wheelchair gives people who use them. Or, “suffers from Down syndrome.” Or “endures spina bifida.”

    Of course, none of this makes it right — and in my more motivated moments, I always intend to email news organizations that use phrases like that.

  • Melody
    Jun 25, 2008 at 4:30 am

    Geez, you don’t even hear this language about people who have a fatal disease like AIDS. Ditto about the last comment. I hear that on the news, especially recently when they were talking about people whose wheelchairs got stolen or something, and they described it as “confined to a wheelchair” and “wheelchair bound”. It’s like the general public just has no clue how to respectfully talk about disabled people, and confuse pity and sympathy with understanding and respect.

Have an opinion? Leave a comment:




Site Meter
Close
E-mail It