Complex & Essential: 2 autism subgroups
There is “complex autism” and there is “essential autism” according to Dr. Judith Miles, professor of pediatrics, Thompson Endowed Chair of Child Health and Pathology and director of the Medical Genetics Division at the University of Missouri-Columbia. Lidia Wasowicz in Ped Med: The many faces of autism notes these distinctions:
- Complex Autism: “20 percent of autistic children differ from the rest in both unusual physical features, such as an abnormal head size or malformed ear or hand, and autistic symptoms, which may include lower IQ, seizures or lack of speech after age 8.”
- Essential Autism: This is a “much larger set of youngsters without the corporeal differences tended to be male and have siblings with a high risk for autism and other kin with the disorder.”
Miles notes that there are both different outcomes and recurrence rates for these two autism subgroups.
I am not sure which subgroup my own Charlie would be said to fit into. He has always had a large head (macrocephaly); Miles mentions children with small heads in the article. His fingers are very long and slender (as long as his palms); again, I am not sure what constitutes “malformed.” Charlie has no siblings but there are relatives who are on the autism spectrum. I am also curious as to why Miles has chosen the terms “complex” and “essential.” I speculate: Might these terms be referring to a child who is autistic and also has symptoms of features of other disorders (such as epilepsy or apraxia), in contrast to a child who “only” has certain “essential” or “core” autistic features?
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Diagnosis, Genetics, Health, Medicine, Neuroscience, Psychology








4 opinions for Complex & Essential: 2 autism subgroups
Mike
Dec 20, 2006 at 12:24 am
Pookie would definitely fit in the “essential” category according to those classifications. Interesting. It will be interesting to see how many different classifications the autism spectrum is broken up into over the next 20 years as more data comes in.
Kristina Chew, PhD
Dec 20, 2006 at 2:43 am
I hope that we can still see all these “autisms” as having some underlying commonality.
Lisa/Jedi
Dec 20, 2006 at 10:26 am
I am just hoping that these sub-groupings lend clarification & actually help people, rather than making things more confusing & oppressive…
Brett
Dec 20, 2006 at 2:31 pm
Kristina,
Dr. Miles’ work first came to my attention about a year ago. (I wrote about here and here.)
The paper in which the distinction between these two types of autism is identified and discussed, href=”http://www.genetics.missouri.edu/EssentialvsComplex.pdf”>Essential Versus Complex Autism: Definition of Fundamental Prognostic Subtypes, provides some insight into how they came up with the distinction.
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: