Autism Vox

“Disabled” vs. “Special”

by Kristina Chew, PhD on October 31st, 2008

“Special”—as in “special needs”: It’s a term used primarily (exclusively?) in regard to children. Sometimes, just saying “special children” means the same thing. But one wouldn’t use the word to refer to adults with disabilities.

Consider this example: At at an October 30th rally in Rush Limbaugh’s hometown of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, McCain-Palin campaign representative Senator Kit Bond (R-Mo) mocked Presidential candidate Senator Barak Obama for saying that he’s looking to nominate judges who empathize with “the disabled.” Sen. Bond was joining Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin at the rally. As noted in a press release from ADA Watch and the National Coalition for Disability Rights:

“It’s Halloween and it seems that Sarah Palin’s mask of support for people with ‘special needs’ is slipping. Despite past pandering to people with disabilities, McCain-Palin are actually opposed to vital disability legislation like the Community Choice Act and they want to appoint judges who will further roll back the civil rights protections of the Americans with Disabilities Act,” declared NCDR’s founder and president, Jim Ward.

NPR’s Nina Totenberg has reported that McCain-Palin’s and conservatives’ “most oft-mentioned prospects” for nomination to the Supreme Court include Ohio Judge Jeffrey Sutton. Sutton was opposed by hundreds of disability organizations when he was nominated by President Bush after successfully weakening the ADA with states’ rights arguments. As a sitting judge, he has recently supported the execution of criminals with developmental disabilities and has undermined the Help America Vote Act(HAVA).

Disability rights advocates are further incensed that the McCain-Palin campaign has reframed this civil rights struggle, one founded in concepts of equality, dignity and self-respect, as an issue of “special needs.”

Disability rights advocate, Steve Gold states, “Yes, we need support services. Yes, we need inclusive education. Yes, we need integrated employment. Yes, we need equal rights. This not ‘special.’ These needs are based on us, people with disabilities, equal members of our communities. We are not inspirational nor are we ‘special.’ We are PROUD PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES who should push back when anyone describes us as anything but equal members of our communities.”

More about what was said at the rally at FOX News.

“Disabled.” “Special.” I know it’s just a matter of words—–and being the mother of a disabled son, and a son for whom talking and communication aren’t easy, I’ve become hyper-aware of how much words matter, and what they say and what they don’t.

Share This

Related Stories

The Only Kind of Advocacy
One Job at a Time
The Kind of Fun That Lasts: Tim Shriver on Diffability
Should Only Disabled Actors Be Cast in Disabled Parts?
The Meaning of Special

POSTED IN: Disability Rights, Language, Legislation, Politics, Stereotypes