Engaging Floortime (5): Tantrums and “free speech”
I am hardly the only autism parent who has had to hang on to their child in the midst of a serious tantrum or meltdown. Meltdowns—or, “behavior squalls that are, as another autism mother writes, like “thunderstorms blowing through”)—are something all autism parents have found themselves witnessing and often in public places. The Autism Every Day video can be said to portray life with an autistic child as one meltdown, one difficult behavior, after another, and while my own view of life with autism is not that at all, an autistic child (especially one, who like my son Charlie, is 75 pounds, 4 1/2 feet tall) in meltdown mode is not the easiest of situations to find yourself in.
I do see Charlie’s tantrums (like the one in the backseat of my car last night) as his honest attempts to communicate his frustration and what he is thinking. Nonetheless, there are less, well, taxing ways of expressing all that then banging one’s head on windows and a good portion of Charlie’s education at school and at home is focused on teaching him, indeed, to communicate and handle his own anxiety, in addition to academics.
The chapter on “Meltdowns and Regressions” in Dr. Stanley Greenspan’s new book Engaging Autism: Using the Floortime Approach to Help Children Relate, Communicate and Think is eight pages long (pp. 361-368; the entire book is 434 pages). Greenspan’s advice on this topic is primarily to tell parents to “go back to the basics” (p. 368)—the basics being the principles of the DIR/Floortime model that have already been extensively detailed in the book. He also suggests that the reason that a child has a tantrum in the first place is due to a parent’s not properly relating to their child. Tantrums in older children are briefly discussed in reference to school situations and the primary suggestion made is to have a “big strong person available” (p. 363). (One wonders if this additional person’s presence might impede the development of the “circles of communication” between teacher and student?)
The chapter begins with an explanation of why meltdowns happen in children in general before making the point that “for many children with ASD, the challenge is to get them more engaged in relationships” (p. 362)—-that is, before Greenspan inserts one of his basic Floortime principles, the need to encourage emotional relatedness in children with ASD. Thus, ignoring the meltdown is an “overly simplistic, deplorable strategy” (p. 362), as is shutting the child in his room in a timeout; as Greenspan writes, “extinguishing the tantrum is a small goal compared to convincing the child that he is loved and that he can rely on you” (p. 362). Nonetheless, Greenspan suggests that a parents might want to “give him a little space—maybe staying across the room so he doesn’t have to look at you”—a rather puzzling statement in light of Greenspan’s emphasis on keeping up a stream of relations and interactions with a child.
A parent is advised to figure out “what is going to help him calm down”—-what any parent indeed tries to do for an upset child, I would think. Greenspan has two specific suggestions, “rhythmic rocking and a calm, soothing voice” and “talking them through it with your voice (”‘It’s okay, we can calm down, sweetheart’” (p. 362) )—-and then, another suggestion to move away from the child by “giving them a couple feet of space” (p. 362)—-which might not be the best thing to do if one’s child is, for instance, lying on the sidewalk and thrashing.
In the next paragraph, Greenspan does note that “if the child is trying to hurt someone, you may have to contain him with a firm bear hug from the back and apply firm pressure….” (p. 363). He acknowledges that keeping a child safe at these moments “is more difficult as they get older.” The rest of the paragraph is in parentheses and is addressed specifically to teachers:
(For teachers who are confronted with kids having meltdowns at school, if the children are big and can be aggressive during a meltdown, and you are not a very big person, there needs to be a big strong person available—–someone who can be both gentle and firm with an aggressive child. He or she might be a volunteer, aide, or teacher who has some training in how to deal with these situations.) (p. 363)
More discussion of meltdowns in older children, or in children who are aggressive to the point of hurting themselves or others, is not provided (and chapter 17, which is about using the DIR approach with older children, adolescents, and autistic adults, says little about how to deal with “behavior problems”). Greenspan only directs his suggestions about having an extra “big strong person available” to teachers—what is a parent to do in their home? He does not specify the “training” such a “big strong person” ought to have——Floortime?
The rest of the chapter on meltdowns (”regressions” are barely discussed) describes “warning signs,” “warding off a meltdown,” and “factors that may contribute to meltdowns and regressions.” Meltdowns in autistic children are “an indication of real helplessness” (pp. 364-365), hence it behooves a parent to attempt the “long-term solution” of “improving a child’s ability to communicate and solve problems with you” (p. 366)—-again, Greenspan refers back to one the basic principles of his Floortime approach as the ultimate answer. “Negotiation, discussion, and compromise” are to be attempted and are indeed “options before the tantrum starts” (p. 363), as if to suggest that a child has a tantrum because his or her parent has not tried these, or tried enough, and hence is not relating well enough to his or her child. That is, a child has a tantrum because (it is implied), the parents are not being responsive enough to the child. As Greenspan then writes,
Rather, the protocol is “Let’s calm down and then we’ll talk about it.” We believe in free speech. There should be no punishments for crying, yelling, or screaming, because after all, we are trying to help children with ASD to be communicative and express emotion. (p. 363)
A child tantrumming, that is, is simply expressing his or her right to “free speech”—-a phrase which rings rather oddly in the midst of what is supposed to be a discussion of meltdowns in autistic children and which suggests that parents who do not view tantrums as such self-expressions of a child’s individuality are denying a child their “rights” and repressing their freedom. Indeed, Greenspan ends this chapter by noting that “a child under stress may often have more meltdowns and tend to regress,” so that “it is wise to go back to the basics” (p. 368)—–those basic Floortime principles of relating, communicating, and thinking, that is. As to why the child is “under stress,” Greenspans suggests that he or she is feeling “not only overwhelmed but also lost” because
He may be experiencing a decreased sense of where he is in physical space (cannot picture Mom in the next room), in time (when will he get to go home?), and in organized thought (a lot of fragmented ideas rather than logical patterns). (p. 368)
I find this final portrait of the child prone to meltdowns puzzling and, indeed, a little eerie. Is the child Greenspan means to describe at home or at school, or elsewhere? Is he suggesting that the child “cannot picture Mom in the next room” because “Mom” is not there? The phrase “when will he get to go home?” seems the thought of a child stuck in some unpleasant place, waiting for his (absent) “Mom” to please take him home—-a “Mom” who, it is implied, needs to get started doing Floortime for parents.
Greenspan’s suggestions on meltdowns would not, I think, be too effective with children whose tantrums are like those in the Autism Every Day video. That is to say, they are not very helpful for parents who, indeed, live with autism every day.
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Books, Family, Parenting, Psychology, Safety, Treatment








7 opinions for Engaging Floortime (5): Tantrums and “free speech”
Jannalou
Jul 21, 2006 at 9:11 am
JE is one of my “favourites” (they’re all my favourites, though). He’s turning 12 this year. I worked with him for two years. I’m 5′9″ and weighed just over 200lbs at the time; the top of his head reached my shoulder and I only had about 60lbs on him. This was when he was ten.
One day, during the summer, we were switching over from me to his afternoon aide. I was writing up my notes for the morning, and everyone else (JE, his older brother, and both JE’s afternoon aide and his brother’s aide) was in the living room, watching a video.
JE stood up; he tends to pace at times. He also likes to pause the video at certain spots and put his face as close to the screen as he can. He also knows how to adjust the colour tinting (green-red) and prefers as much red as he can get. And, of course, he loves to rewind and watch the same part over and over again.
JE’s brother has Asperger Syndrome, and when JE stood up, he said (quite sharply), “No!” He thought JE was about to rewind again, something we were trying to discourage as it’s not good for either the machine or the video itself. So this came from a good place. However…
JE proceeded to scream and cry and throw a fit.
He sat back down on the couch and started throwing himself against the back of it (nearly hitting his head on the wall). I was there immediately, which was a good thing since nobody else was really doing anything about the situation.
First, I turned off the video.
I got in there as close as I could (avoiding a couple of kicks as I went) and managed to kneel with my legs on his feet and my arms on his knees, pressing down. Deep pressure usually calms him down, especially on his legs, but I definitely wasn’t going to be able to get him to let me hold his legs in my hands in order to massage them!
The whole time, I talked to him in a calm voice, very matter-of-factly. Reminding him to breathe, telling him that once he calmed down we could turn the movie back on, etc.
It took probably about ten minutes for him to be able to remain calm when we turned the movie back on. We counted to ten, and when he got to ten we could put it back on, but if he got upset then it went off and we had to count again.
The whole time I did this, the other aides just kind of watched me work.
I don’t have special training in how to do that sort of thing, I just have instinct and experience - particularly with that child. Neither of the other aides could have (or would have) done what I did with him there.
What do you suppose Greenspan would say about it? (I already know that most ABA “consultants” would tell me I totally messed up.)
alexander's daddy
Jul 21, 2006 at 9:29 am
“He also suggests that the reason that a child has a tantrum in the first place is due to a parent’s not properly relating to their child.”
You’ve got to be kidding!!!!
Kristina, have you given any thought to posting your critique on Amazon?
Kristina Chew, PhD
Jul 21, 2006 at 12:09 pm
AD, that’s a good thought….thanks…..
Jannalou, I can too well picture, and feel, the situation that you describe. I’ve been through several like that with Charlie and yes, at those times, I have not done a very good job following ABA principles. (I am thinking of the time Charlie had a big tantrum, with head-banging, in our car and I had to sit in the back seat and hang onto him, and the police came by.) For Greenspan just to say “the child must be calmed down first” seems to state the obvious.
As you note in trying to “count to 10″ with JE, these sorts of tantrums don’t just end, they spiral down, and as much as I know that giving a tantrumming child all that attention by hanging onto him (rather than moving those few feet away, as Greenspan suggests), it would simply be unsafe and irresponsible to let him keep on hurting himself. In fact, our ABA therapists have made that point to us very firmly—-safety comes first.
So while I am no Floortime therapist, just a blogger reviewing Greenspan’s book—-I would say, he would refer you to p. 363 about having a “big, strong person available.”
(An answer I don’t think is an answer.)
Joe
Jul 21, 2006 at 1:07 pm
Interesting that this thread and the one on the death of Raymond Lee Mitchell are right next to each other. Maybe if there had been some kind of “tantrum plan” thought out ahead of time, he would still be alive.
I know where my son goes to speech and ot, they have a plan when my son (who is six) acts up. However, I don’t think his school has a plan (or even a clue for that matter).
Autism Vox » Engaging Floortime (7): The “First Principle” of Floortime
Jul 25, 2006 at 8:20 am
[…] What Greenspan’s view of meltdowns and tantrums is—an expression of a child’s “free speech”—and my uncertainty as to the practical applications of his suggestions (Engaging Floortime (5): Tantrums and “free speech”); […]
Julia
Jul 27, 2006 at 1:56 pm
Janna - that sounds a lot like how I dealt with one of Sam’s rare true tantrums (as opposed to a meltdown). Nice to know it’s a good solution! :)
Julia
Jul 27, 2006 at 1:58 pm
Joe, if there is a plan at home and elsewhere, I think that plan should be in your son’s IEP for school.
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: